Forums The Professionals Current Page

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #7744 Reply | Quote
    Whale
    Flatchatter

      Our Owners Corporation (O/C) is having having difficulties with the Tenants of one Lot who are regularly in Breach of By-Laws as a consequence of their regular domestic disputes, that have already resulted in damage to the Common Property and to the Personal Property of other Residents.

      Over the past 3 months these Tenants have been spoken to (nicely) by another Executive Committee (EC) Member and myself, then issued with our Breach of By-Laws Advice letter, then served with a Notice to Comply under Sect. 45; and still the Breaches continue.

      The Police and Ambulance have attended on three occasions (I have the Police Event Numbers), and so as Secretary, I contacted the absentee proprietor / landlord and his property manager with a request that they issue a 30 day Termination Notice to the Tenants, as their Tenancy Agreement is still within its fixed term.

      That window of opportunity passed without any action by the landlord or his property manager, presumably because the Tenants are paying the rent.

      So here's one for our Legal Experts:

      As the Strata & Community Titles Division of the Consumer, Trader, and Tenancy Tribunal (CTTT) has in the past been proven quite useless in solving such matters, and as an Owners Corporation (O/C) is not a “person” under the Tenancy Division of the CTTT, and as on the last occasion that I checked, I was a “person”, I was contemplating making an Application for an Order under the Tenancy Division under Cl 187 1(a) of the NSW Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (the Act) to “restrain any action in breach of a tenancy agreement” by the tenants” – i.e. the Clause about compliance with By-Laws.

      The Act doesn't include a definition for an “other person” who may make an Application to the CTTT under Cl 187 1(a), so I thought that I may give it a go.

      Thoughts on this approach please, and any others that may provide an O/C with an effective avenue to manage dysfunctional tenants in circumstances where proprietor/landlords and their property managers (who are “persons” under the Act) will not act in any way that's contrary to their self-interest.  

    Viewing 8 replies - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
    • Author
      Replies
    • #14065 Reply
      clive2000
      Flatchatter

        A person who damages another's property negligently can be sued for damages, so likewise your owners corporation should be able to sue anyone who negligently damages the common property.

         

        Also, section 44 provides effectively that the bylaws constitute a contract (covenant) between the OC, and individual owners and tenants. So technically, anyone who is bound by a bylaw and breaches it, is in breach of contract and can be sued for damages in say the Local Court (I understand that CTTT doesn't have jurisdiction over damages claims for breach of contract or negligence), although I have never seen section 44 used in such a manner. If section 44 could be enforced in this way, then there would be no need for notices to comply etc to be used, and the OC could sue the tenant directly.

         

        Perhaps some of the lawyers could comment further.

        #14069 Reply
        Whale
        Flatchatter
        Chat-starter

          Thanks for those comments Clive, and although those Residents whose personal property was damaged are considering Civil Action against the perpetrators, our O/C is trying to “stretch” the traditional mechanisms, not necessarily venture into non-traditional ones; at least for an O/C.  

          Apart from the costs of civil proceedings, even if our O/C was successful, we can't get blood from a (Centrelink) stone! 

          #14072 Reply
          Jimmy-T
          Keymaster

            Your other option may be to get your EC to issue a Notice To Comply to the Landlord for their failure to ensure that their tenants observe by-laws.  A precedent has been set where landlords can be made accountable for their tenants' behaviour if they are made aware of it and choose to do nothing.  Have a go. 

            Or you could try getting a noise abatement order at the District Court against the tenants. That has a bit more heft – it's a criminal offence to breach it.

            If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
            #14101 Reply
            Whale
            Flatchatter
            Chat-starter

              I'm not sure about issuing a Notice to Comply to an absentee owner, but in any case, after I pointed out to the owner that these violent incidents by his current tenants would need to be disclosed to any prospective future tenants under the provisions of the NSW Strata Schemes Management Regulation (2010), he saw the merit in instructing his Property Manager to issue a 14 day Notice of Termination to his tenants, and they departed after 3 days!!

              Back to my original query though — can a member of an E/C (a person) as opposed to the O/C (a non-person) make an Application to the Tenancy Division of the CTTT for an Order under Cl 187 1(a) of the NSW Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (the Act) to “restrain any action in breach of a tenancy agreement” by tenants”?

              My O/C and no doubt others really need some sound advice here, because right now, and in the absence of cooperation from Landlords and their Property Managers, O/C's have little real ability to effectively manage poorly behaving tenants. 

              #14103 Reply
              FlatChatFan
              Flatchatter

                Usually where there is domestic violence there is a victim and a perpetrator.  Often the victim believes that they “deserve” the abuse they receive.

                If there are children, the perpetrator will often threaten to kill the children if the victim tries to leave. Sometimes the violence escalates to murder.

                In your situation Whale, if there is a victim, that person probably believes that the police are powerless seeing they have attended, yet the abuse continues. 

                There are Refuges and services for victims, but usually they need someone to tell them they do not have to put up with the abuse and direct them to some options.  Social Workers at hospitals or Community Centres can help with advice. The front of a telephone directory gives Community organisations.

                Once the victim is safe, then you seem to have enough evidence of damage, etc. to continue to remove the perpetrator.

                #14119 Reply
                Whale
                Flatchatter
                Chat-starter

                  I seem to have lead some posters away from the core issue raised (probably my fault), and so to clarify, as E/C Secretary in our self-managed Plan I'm not concerned about the nature of disruptive incidents perse, but moreso about the actions that an O/C can take against residents (tenants) who are continually in Breach the Plan's By-Laws and the conditions of their Tenancy Agreements as a consequence of such incidents. 

                  #14120 Reply
                  Billen Ben
                  Flatchatter

                    Whale said:

                    Our Owners Corporation (O/C) is having having difficulties with the Tenants of one Lot who are regularly in Breach of By-Laws ………….

                    So here's one for our Legal Experts:

                    As the Strata & Community Titles Division of the Consumer, Trader, and Tenancy Tribunal (CTTT) has in the past been proven quite useless in solving such matters, ……………

                    Does the above mean your OC has tried to have the tenants fined for failure to comply with a notice to comply and been unsuccessful?

                    #14127 Reply
                    Whale
                    Flatchatter
                    Chat-starter

                      Yes!

                      We’ve been to the Strata & Community Titles Division of the CTTT on two occasions.

                      On the first occasion we became entangled in the CTTT’s  passion for arbitration, whereupon the tenants agreed to comply with almost everything and upon their return did totally nothing.

                      On the second occasion, the matter was dismissed because the (different) tenants weren’t provided with a copy of our Plan’s By-Laws by their Agent; and this was despite the fact that the O/C had placed those and its customary “welcome” letter in the Unit’s letterbox just after the commencement of their tenancy, and the fact that everything was posted on the O/C’s Notice Board.

                      So on the next occasion that we experience poorly behaving tenants and our normal approach of trying to reason with them, then issuing a written Advice, then a Notice to Comply, and then by directly approaching our Proprietor/Landlord all fails to achieve resolution, then in the absence of any contrary advice it is our intention to have an E/C Member lodge an Application with the Tenancy Division of the CTTT seeking General Orders under the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (Act) to restrain any breaches of the Agreement by the tenants (e.g. non compliance with By-Laws).

                      That Act restricts most such Applications to Tenants and Landlords, but it appears that General Orders can be sought by “other persons”, and as such “persons” are not defined in the Act, we thought that we’d give that approach a try, simply because it has more clout than anything that can be achieved under the Strata Schemes Management Act 1996, and because we have nothing to loose! 

                      I'll keep everyone posted (sorry!).  

                    Viewing 8 replies - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
                    Reply To: Action by Executive Committee Member under the NSW Residential Tenancies Act 2010
                    PLEASE ... If your property is not in NSW, mention its location (state). Don't identify companies or individuals by name. Don't mention or promote your company or services. Keep acronyms and initials to a minimum. Please, don’t use “quote” unless there is a specific point to which you wish to refer, then highlight (define) that specific passage before you click on "quote". Otherwise just use reply. THANKS.

                    You can use BBCodes to format your content.
                    Your account can't use all available BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

                    Your information:




                    Forums The Professionals Current Page