Forums From the Front Page Current Page

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #83127 Reply | Quote
    Jimmy-T
    Keymaster

      The DBPA, designed to protect us from dodgy builders, has exposed us to additional costs. The Building Commission explains why.

      [See the full post at: Facts and faults – how the DBPA works and why]

      If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
    Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
    • Author
      Replies
    • #83132 Reply
      Jimmy-T
      Keymaster
      Chat-starter

        Some background:

        Apartment buildings are the only building class where the remedial requirements of the DBPA currently apply.
        The Act introduced requirements for remedial work in apartment buildings covering critical construction elements, such as:
        • Load bearing components, like slabs, beams, columns and structural walls
        • Waterproofing, like balconies, rooves, bathrooms and membranes
        • Fire safety, like fire doors, cladding interfaces and passive fire protection
        • Building enclosure / façade systems, like external walls and windows.
        This rectification work often needs to comply with the BCA, which improves the quality of remedial work by including the latest safety requirements.
        However, some of the internal and external building work generally defined as exempt development under the State Environmental Planning Policy includes:
        • A doorway, wall, ceiling, or floor lining
        • A bathroom or kitchen
        • A built-in fixture such as vanity, cupboard, wardrobe
        • An existing sanitary fixture (e.g. a grease trap or similar)
        • Painting, plastering, cement rendering, cladding, attaching fittings or decorative work,
        • The replacement of an external window, glazing areas or a door (other than those on bush fire prone land),
        • The repair to or replacement of a non-structural wall or roof cladding,
        • The installation of a security screen or grill to a door or window or a security door,
        • The repair to or replacement of a balustrade.
        A general guide on remedial work for apartments and information on exemptions can be found here.  For a guide on ‘exempt development’ requirements, see here.
        If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
        #83193 Reply
        Strata Ken
        Flatchatter

          So, it seems that the problem are that engineers are specifying excessive requirements, and then there aren’t enough waterproofers so they are all pushing the prices up. One quote for our remediation was half of what would be charged to build a whole new block of units.

          My reading of the rules is that bathrooms are exempt unless there is more than one dwelling, in which case the paper work needs to be done. I haven’t gone through all the rules, but one difficult requirement is that waterproofing has to be done as a single sheet. Much fun because the bathrooms in mystery strata have tiles to the ceiling, resulting in a big job, to fix what is needed which is probably just the base of the shower. Or is that interpretation correct?

          #83195 Reply
          Jimmy-T
          Keymaster
          Chat-starter

            ‘…bathrooms are exempt unless there is more than one dwelling,’

            Which would mean that unit block bathrooms are not exempt. So how does that apply to townhouse bathrooms? We need a document like the “Who’s responsible?”guide that came out a few years ago.  My insider at the Building Commission said that one problem is that the BCA was written to apply to technologies many of which are long out of date and then the builders try to apply the letter of the law absolutely strictly.

            If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
          Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
          Reply To: Reply #83132 in Facts and faults – how the DBPA works and why
          PLEASE ... If your property is not in NSW, mention its location (state). Don't identify companies or individuals by name. Don't mention or promote your company or services. Keep acronyms and initials to a minimum. Please, don’t use “quote” unless there is a specific point to which you wish to refer, then highlight (define) that specific passage before you click on "quote". Otherwise just use reply. THANKS.

          You can use BBCodes to format your content.
          Your account can't use all available BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

          Your information:




          Forums From the Front Page Current Page