Forum Replies Created

Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • in reply to: Persistent by-law breaches by tenants #65387
    fhutt
    Flatchatter
    Chat-starter

      After reading all the responses I think the bast option to deal with tenants breaching by-laws is via the landlord.

      The landlord alone (+ the Tribunal) has the power of termination.

      The Strata Committee only has the power to issue a notice to comply followed by an application for a penalty that a tenant might appeal. For self managed schemes the Committee would need to get involved to issue a notice to comply. A lot of work for little gain.

      I would like to thank everyone who contributed to in this post.

      in reply to: Persistent by-law breaches by tenants #65339
      fhutt
      Flatchatter
      Chat-starter

        S, I noticed the term ‘No eviction by Owners Corporation’ in your link to the Tenants Union.

        But, that is not legislation. I would like to find that.

        The link to the legislation states the Tribunal MAY order termination. It doesn’t state that only the Tribunal may order a termination.

        I don’t see how termination would be  harsh, unconscionable or oppressive when that tenant outright refuses to comply with some by-laws. This tenant even ignores any communication from the Owners Corporation and only communicates with the leasing agent. Also, what about the tenant staying and causing a harsh, unconscionable or oppressive environment to other residents due the non compliance of by-laws.

        David Ng, thank you for your comments. I agree that a termination notice by a tenant during  a fixed term may attract a break fee, but the landlord may waive that fee to get rid of that tenant.

        Usually such behaviour extends into the periodic term of a lease when the there would be no break fee.

        But my original question was – would that by-law be an illegal one and would a tribunal strike it down?

        in reply to: Persistent by-law breaches by tenants #65299
        fhutt
        Flatchatter
        Chat-starter

          Thank you for your reply S.

          The By-Law suggested does not evict a tenant but requires the tenant to provide a Termination Notice to the landlord. I admit the overall effect is the same, but the Owners Corp does not actually evict or provide a Termination Notice.

          If however, NCAT sees this as you suggest and dismiss the request to have the tenant provide  a Termination Notice I have gained nothing.

          Could you point me to the legislation where it states that only the NCAT can evict tenants?

        Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)