[muz28]

Thanks Jimmy.

The papers I received were not original, nor were they certified by a JP.

Different typefaces were used here and there were information is displayed and there was other tell tale signs the “so called legal documents” were completely fraudulent.  I asked the candidate further information about the relationship and was told in no uncertain term term to mind my **** business.

Is there a requirement that the provide original or certified documentation?  If no proper documentation can be supplied am I legally able to put aside the nomination and know it can’t be challenged at a later date?

It is used to be easy, the members on the committee ALL had to be owners or representing a corporation.  This change has opened up a can or worms in our case.

[muz28]

@Kangaroo said:
Hmmm, an uncle or a daughter.

Make them present their credentials to the OC.

Uncle should be Niece.  The line should have read … “The person nominated it has come to light is in fact the Niece of the owner rather than a daughter as the person is claiming. “

The papers I requested to see were very dubious in nature, really a complete fraud.  At the end of the day an interstate owner trying to get a vote on the committee which they would otherwise not get.

 

[muz28]

We have a situation in our complex in Queensland where a nomination has been received for a committee position.  The person nominated it has come to light is in fact the Uncle of the owner rather than a daughter as the person is claiming.  

This is an  extremely difficult situation we have round ourselves in as under the law they are not a member of their “immediate” family.  We have only three nominations at this stage and removing this person would mean if no other owners turned up to the AGM (non committee members), we would e left without a functioning committee.  

What is a good way to solve this issue?

[Author]

Replies