Forum Replies Created

Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • in reply to: Kitchen Tile – Is Acoustic Underlay Needed? #29624

    @twosailram thanks.

    I did consider floating floor but I think tile is more water resistant than a floating floor.

    in reply to: Kitchen Tile – Is Acoustic Underlay Needed? #29597

    @JimmyT thanks for your response. I appreciate it.


    @Austman
    thank you too.

    there is currently a floating timber floor, the neighbours downstairs have said they haven’t heard anything.

    in reply to: Kitchen Tile – Is Acoustic Underlay Needed? #29592

    Thanks JimmyT for the speedy response. I get what you are saying and make  good points.

    I understand if I ask a lawyer a question, I get a lawyer response.

    If I ask a strata manager a question I get a strata manager response.

    I’m just trying to collect all the facts so I can make the right decision.

    btw. I was quoting the actual by-law of the building.

    To add some more info:

    I contacted two tilers and they both said they haven’t ever added acoustic underlay in the kitchen before – other than in the case where they tiled into the dining/living room and needed the level to be the same.

    The entrance, is already tiled but it doesn’t have any underlay. so if I put in new tiles in only the kitchen with underlay, there would be a small ramp from the entrance tiles to the kitchen tiles (entrance 12mm, kitchen 17-20mm). Aesthetic wise I prefer to keep the same level.

    The most popular underlay seemed to be Regupol 4515 4.5mm but it has a Ln,w 61

    In my mind, the kitchen isn’t a place where people would spend a lot of time, so the underlay doesn’t seem to add much value …

Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)