Thanks!
I read the lexology summary and the OC did ‘lose’ however the Judge only ordered them to give reasonable access for reverse in / forward out parking manoeuvre. They did not have to provide forward in / reverse out parking.
The applicant is trying to lump in 2 issues into 1. The by-law passed the 80’s is a rough sketch and the allotted spaces do not align with what area is actually paved. We obviously need to fix this, however will the judge see this as a big issue?