SM commissions ban to save $300m says report

iStock-1483994492-e1774413386903.jpg

BBanning insurance commission paymens will save state economy $300m says PEC report

Banning commissions paid by service providers to strata managers will benefit them, their owner clients and boost the economy of NSW by hundreds of millions of dollars, according to a report by the NSW Productivity and Equality Commission (PEC).

A review requested by Fair Trading Minister Anoulak Chanthivong following the Netstrata scandal  has found that moving from a commission-based model to a fee-for-service arrangement “can simplify remuneration structures, improve competition and service quality, increase trust, and lower strata costs.”

“Some stakeholders expressed concern that the removal of commissions will increase management fees to cover strata manager costs, but this is expected to be offset by reduced premiums and other service costs,” the report says.

‘The positive experiences of strata managers operating on a fee-for-service basis shows we can be confident that this change will be sustainable and will enhance competition in the sector.”

The PEC found that transition from a commissions-based model to a fee-for-service structure could generate net benefits for NSW of more than $300 million over the next fifteen years. 

SCA (NSW), the state’s professional body for strata managers, has welcomed the report, noting that it  examined four options for the Government to consider and made seven recommendations, including a prohibition on strata managers accepting commissions, supporting industry and owners with a gradual, three-year transition period to minimise the impacts across the broader sector and following this change, a reduction in regulatory burden for strata managers by removing the requirement to seek three quotes for insurance. 

“Last year, the SCA (NSW) Board resolved to support and encourage members to begin a phased replacement of insurance commissions for strata managing agents. This voluntary transition commenced on 1 January 2026,” said SCA (NSW) President Robert Anderson.  

However, not all strata managers are members of SCA and the law currently only requires them to declare any commissions they take. Two years ago strata management giant Netstrata was exposed in the media for claiming they did not accept commissions on insurance policies while a subsidiary brokerage that they owned did.

Fair Trading’s investigations into that situation are still active although the company has received the very public support of NSW Premier Chris Minns.

“Our sector has been aware of the Government’s intention to review insurance remuneration practices for some time, and the Board’s decision was only taken after careful consideration and consultation. It was our ongoing commitment to raise professional standards, strengthen consumer trust, and deliver better outcomes for owners and residents living in strata communities.”

The report is not yet part of NSW government policy but SCA (NSW) says it believes that a three-year, gradual phased replacement of insurance commissions presents the best opportunity to move forward for the industry and consumers.

While commissions received by strata managers were the primary focus of the review, the report says, the PEC found that restricting commissions in the strata services supply chain – for instance, among insurance brokers and other service providers – would have further benefits for NSW.

This could be achieved by prohibiting strata managers’ involvement in commission-based contracts, regulating suppliers directly or collaborating with the Australian Government for reform, says the report.

“Conflicted relationships may remain an issue The Review identified broader issues within the strata management sector, such as the growing trend toward vertical integration between strata management firms and various service providers including insurance broking, maintenance, repairs, and other ancillary services,” it continues.

“Personal or business connections may create commission-like incentives, whereby strata managers benefit financially or otherwise from directing business to related entities. The NSW Government should monitor developments related to these practices and formally evaluate recent disclosure changes targeting these relationships.”

Considering the amount of work involved and the cultural change this represents, the report says the NSW Government should allow commissions to be phased out over three years. This will allow strata managers to adjust pricing and systems without risking their viability or creating unnecessary implementation costs.

For owners, it adds, the NSW Government should roll out education campaigns to explain what to expect and develop standardised template documents for strata managers to facilitate easier communication of the changes.

Newsletter

To subscribe (for free) to our weekly Flat Chat newsletter, bringing you links to our  latest posts, just click HERE.

Forums Current Page

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #83393 Reply | Quote
    Jimmy-T
    Keymaster

      Productivity and Equality Commission report says phasing out insurance commissions for strata managers will save state millions.

      [See the full post at: SM commissions ban to save $300m says report]

      If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
    Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
    • Author
      Replies
    • #83402 Reply
      woodg62
      Flatchatter

        I can’t see how any savings will be made. If a SM is getting, say $5000 in commissions and that is stopped they will just raise their fees by that amount. In fact, our SM (who is very good) has already told us that if commissions are removed, they will be increasing their fees. The commissions are part of their income.

        #83433 Reply
        Jimmy-T
        Keymaster
        Chat-starter

          I think the savings will be made when insurers have to be more competitive with their products and the premiums they charge, rather than their enticements for strata managers. Yes, the SMs may well increase their fees, not least by adding a “fee for service”, but at least that won’t be a raw precentage of the insurance premium.

          It shouldn’t cost 10 times as much to negotiate insurance cover for a block with ten times as many apartments. Th blocks that will feel the most pain are the smaller ones where the fee for service is more than the commission based on a percentage.

          As for the $300m – I guess that’s how much will be saved over the next ten years when money for nothing is taken out of the equation.

          If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
          #83434 Reply
          Quirky
          Flatchatter

            This saving prediction also presumes that the commission paid to insurance brokers will also be abolished. Hopefully, there will also be some attention paid to there only being 3 insurance companies that are insuring strata buildings. The plethora of insurance companies quoting for the mandatory insurance of an apartment building are mostly just subsidiaries of the 2 big insurers – and there is one independent insurer operating in the market.

          Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
          Reply To: SM commissions ban to save $300m says report
          PLEASE ... If your property is not in NSW, mention its location (state). Don't identify companies or individuals by name. Don't mention or promote your company or services. Keep acronyms and initials to a minimum. Please, don’t use “quote” unless there is a specific point to which you wish to refer, then highlight (define) that specific passage before you click on "quote". Otherwise just use reply. THANKS.

          You can use BBCodes to format your content.
          Your account can't use all available BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

          Your information:




          Forums Current Page

          Forums Current Page

          scroll to top