Strata Trapped: Manager lashes out at ABC

Screenshot-2024-09-19-181037.png

Mr Lee leaves the AGM surrounded by security guards while frustrated owners hurl abuse.

Michael Lee, a strata manager and committee chair highlighted in the ABC TV Four Corners report The Strata Trap, has lashed out at the controversial documentary’s allegations, saying they contain “numerous false and misleading allegations” which he alleges are defamatory, were illegally obtained and that the outcome has been damaging to his standing in the community as well as potentially injurious to his mental and emotional health.  

The Strata Trap alleged that Mr Lee controlled the committee of his defect-ridden apartment block and resisted efforts by a majority of owners to remove him and other members of the committee and replace them with new elected representatives.

The TV program showed footage of owners claiming they had enough votes to depose the committee.  Later at the AGM, some owners could be seen being refused entry to the meeting by security guards while people in the meeting chanted “let them in.”

Later in the meeting Mr Lee declared that a slate of committee members had been elected, presumably to the exclusion of the challengers, some of whom could be heard shouting “what was the vote”.

It was also alleged that, at a subsequent NSW Civil Administrative Tribunal (NCAT) application for compulsory management – a process by which a strata committee is replaced by a strata manager who has total power over the running of the building – Mr Lee or his committee had approved the appointment of a strata management company owned by his wife.

In an open letter in response to the Four Corners episode, issued on the day after the program was aired, Mr Lee objected to “the primary claims made in the program” which included that he hired security guards at a general meeting and blocked several owners from entering the meeting venue; that in 2021, he surprised lot owners with a proposal to release the builder from their responsibilities to remediate defects and that he consented to compulsory management.

It’s worth noting that Mr Lee doesn’t challenge that these things occurred, but denies that he authorised them himself. Rather, he says, it was done with the approval of the strata committee of which he was chair, secretary and treasurer.

“The decision to hire security guards was not mine alone; it was a collective decision made by the Strata Committee due to prior incidents of aggression and violence from certain individuals,” Mr Lee says in an open letter sent out this week.  “The security was there to protect not only me but all committee members. The implication that I used strata funds for personal reasons is entirely false and defamatory.”

He adds: “The individuals who were blocked from entering the meeting were not registered lot owners. Under strata laws, only registered lot owners or their proxies have the right to attend AGMs. Their exclusion was lawful, and their disruptive behaviour during the meeting only highlights why security was necessary.”

Who determined that they were not lot owners or didn’t hold proxies from lot owners, or how they did so, is not explained.

Mr Lee also denied that he had agreed to release the builder from their responsibilities to repair common property against the wishes of the majority of owners.

“The decision to release the builder in 2021 was made by the majority of lot owners at the AGM, following a proper democratic process,” he says in his letter.

“The motion to release the builder was supported by more than 80% of the owners, driven by the excessive legal costs of litigation. This decision was not mine alone and was made with transparency and in full compliance with the law.”

Finally, he denies that he consented to compulsory management claiming instead that the decision was made collectively by the committee.

“As Chairman, I do not have the authority to make such decisions unilaterally, and any suggestion to the contrary is both misleading and defamatory,” he wrote.

Mr Lee goes on to accuse the ABC report of “dangerous” and irresponsible journalism which has put him under “tremendous emotional strain.”

“I have been subjected to ongoing harassment and have been portrayed as a villain in my own community, which has exacerbated feelings of isolation,” he says in the letter.

“Being unfairly depicted as a dictator-like figure, as the program suggests, has had a direct impact on my personal and professional life, and has taken a toll on my mental health.”

Under the headline “legal and ethical violations” Mr Lee alleges that the footage of the meeting was obtained “without consent, in violation of privacy laws”.

“This intrusion into my private and professional life constitutes a breach of my legal rights, and the publication of this footage without my permission is a clear violation of media ethics,” he says.

“Privacy and consent are fundamental in journalistic practices, and in this case, both were blatantly disregarded.”

He also claims the “defamatory nature of the program has caused irreparable harm to my reputation” and “damaged my standing both within the strata community and in my professional life.”

Finally, he accuses investigative reporter Linton Besser of taking sides in a long-standing internal dispute, “further fueling division and conflict”.

“This kind of behavior not only violates journalistic integrity but also fosters a toxic environment, both within the strata community and beyond,” Mr Lee writes.

The Four Corners report is available online and on ABC iView and you can view it HERE (the part relating to Mr Lee strata at about 9mins 45 sec in). It includes hugely disparaging comments about Mr Lee’s actions from an NCAT Member saying the fateful AGM should be struck from the record and a new one held.
You can read Mr Lee’s response to the Four Corners episode in full HERE.

Flat Chat Strata Forum Current Page

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #76141
    Jimmy-T
    Keymaster

      Michael Lee, a strata manager and committee chair highlighted in the ABC TV Four Corners report The Strata Trap, has lashed out at the controversial d
      [See the full post at: Strata Trapped: Manager lashes out at ABC]

      The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers.
    Viewing 6 replies - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
    • Author
      Replies
    • #76179
      StopfordKid
      Flatchatter

        I’ve watched the Four Corners episode and am fully supportive of what they aired – the system is a complete shambles and allows dubious schemes run by dubious individuals to infiltrate the system at all levels.

        What I can’t work out, and wasn’t apparent to me in the Four Corners Episode, was:

        (a) What was motivating Mr Lee to carry on like this – surely it wasn’t just some crazy power trip,

        (b) What was his role at that building apart from being the committee chair (+ other committee roles). Is he also a property owner in the building? what are his other associated interests etc?, and

        (c) Where else do his tentacles spread to – either directly or indirectly?

        #76181
        Jimmy-T
        Keymaster
        Chat-starter

          (a) What was motivating Mr Lee to carry on like this – surely it wasn’t just some crazy power trip,

          We shouldn’t assume anything, but we know from other examples that the nexus whereby a strata manager keeps the committee in power, and the committee keeps the strata manager in a job, is prevalent throughout strata. Mr Lee was strata manager and chair, secretary and treasurer of that building.

          The allegations of the owners agreeing not to pursue legal action against the developer for defects probably bear closer scrutiny but plenty of schemes have decided to do exactly that because litigation is always expensive bu not always effective.

           

          (b) What was his role at that building apart from being the committee chair (+ other committee roles). Is he also a property owner in the building? what are his other associated interests etc?,

          Yes, he is also an owner, or at least he said he was at that fractious meeting.

          (c) Where else do his tentacles spread to – either directly or indirectly?

          He and his wife have strata management companies and he is still operating in several buildings, as is William Wang, for that matter, while his appeal against being “struck off” is heard by the Tribunal.

           

          The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers.
          • This reply was modified 2 weeks, 5 days ago by .
          #76182
          Shortcrust
          Flatchatter

            These are excellent questions which were not raised let alone addressed in the program. I feel the issue of strata mismanagement by agents, committees and (from what I discovered on my short time involved in owning a strata unit), lethargic politicians needs a far deeper and wider investigation.

            • This reply was modified 2 weeks, 5 days ago by .
            #76187
            Jimmy-T
            Keymaster
            Chat-starter

              These are excellent questions which were not raised let alone addressed in the program. I feel the issue of strata mismanagement by agents, committees and (from what I discovered on my short time involved in owning a strata unit), lethargic politicians needs a far deeper and wider investigation.

              You have seven states and territories each with their own very distinctive strata laws. Within that spread, you have corruption, conflict of interests, owner apathy and ignorance, defects, discrimination, self-interest and uncertainty.  “The Strata Trap” was a pretty good start at tackling a problem of Herculean proportions.

              For what it’s worth, I think our politicians across Australia believe people who choose to live in apartments deserve what they get.  Just look at how they made Airbnb our problem, not theirs.

              The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers.
              #76433
              StopfordKid
              Flatchatter

                Thanks for the reply Jimmy. I wasn’t aware that he was the Strata Manager as well as everything else. It makes more sense now why he acted the way that he did.

                That sort of conflict should be banned or at the very least it should be voted for approval at every AGM/contract renewal – obviously excluding the conflicted party(ies) and their associates, proxies and other hangers-on etc.

                #76435
                Jimmy-T
                Keymaster
                Chat-starter

                  It’s very difficult to police these situations, where someone just digs in, lies and cheats to defend their position. Add in the racial factor – where overseas and local ethnicities are getting a different set of “facts” from the actuality – and it is ripe for exploitation by ruthless individuals. Complaints on that front are often met with accusations of racism.

                  On top of that, the Tribunal is often remote from all this, with many Members having zero idea of how strata works (or doesn’t). Then you get the ridiculous situation where a strata manager and committee chair is removed because of corrupt behaviour, only to be replaced by a company nominally run by their spouse, who is given total control over the strata scheme as a statutorily appointed manager.

                  Strata schemes are, by statute, excluded from company law. Change that and penalise corrupt behaviour as a crime and maybe things will improve.

                  The two most prominent NSW strata managers who have lost their licences or contracts because of their behaviour in recent months are still operating as they wait for NCAT to hear their appeals.  Just think how much damage they can do in the interim.

                  The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers.
                Viewing 6 replies - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
                • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

                Flat Chat Strata Forum Current Page

                Flat Chat Strata Forum Current Page

                scroll to top