- This topic has 13 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 5 months, 1 week ago by .
-
Topic
-
I am secretary/treasurer of the strata committee in a small block of 8 units with 5 resident owners. The other committee member, the chair, and I bought into the block last year, purchasing from the previous committee members who had left the finances in a terrible state. We were aware of that but the block so suits our needs and preferences we bought anyway. We have set about trying to get things back to a sustainable position.
We are looking to self-management as part of that solution. Our AGM is next month just before our contract with a PICA group strata manager expires. We have notified the strata managers of our intention to include a motion to move to self-management and provided the details for that. It was our hoped that we could transfer a month after the meeting, delaying that long because a levy becomes due in the meantime and the levy notices will be sent out before the meeting. We would be ready to go on the contract expiry date.
The strata managers have come back to us to say that, what with the Christmas break coming up, they could not possibly be ready until 3 months after the meeting.
Is this reasonable?
I have prepared a treasurer’s report for the financial year which reviews expenditure over almost 3 years and uses that to estimate the budget and levies which need a serious increase to start to make good the terrible state we have started from. It sets out the reasoning in some detail. I had hoped to have that report acknowledged by the owners in a motion at the meeting but, while they will include the report in the meeting papers, they do not want to have such a motion. The report includes the administrative fund budget, with the capital works fund budget coming from the 10-year capital works plan we developed ourselves to replace the last plan from 2018. The new plan is being put forward for adoption by the owners in a separate motion. But the budget they want to include is the one their systems will generate which almost certainly will be woefully inadequate. I think they will accept the proposed levies based on the the treasurer’s report budget but they will be inconsistent with the budget they will put forward.
I had also suggested that there be two contingent motions regarding the extension of contract, one in the case of self-management being adopted and one for full retention of them as strata managers, both clearly specifying the term of the extension, one of which would lapse depending on the outcome of the self-management motion. They have come back and said they only want a single motion reappointing them for their standard term of 3 years, which we can amend to the 3 months they need to prepare for transfer.
Are they not obliged to accept the strata committee’s requests for the conduct of meetings?
What options do we have other than just rolling over and acceding to their intransigence?
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.