Forums The Professionals Current Page

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #10423 Reply | Quote

    I’m sure many strata schemes have discovered, well after the defects liability period, that building elements certified as compliant by the developer/builder DO NOT COMPLY….typically water-proof membranes, fire dampers in ducts, in-ground plumbing etc.

    As the developer/builder have long gone taking their profits with them, is it possible to sue the independent certifier engaged by them, especially if their is evidence that what was certified clear didn’t comply?

     

    M

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #24832 Reply
    Jimmy-T
    Keymaster

      @Merton Kidd said:
      As the developer/builder have long gone taking their profits with them, is it possible to sue the independent certifier engaged by them, especially if their is evidence that what was certified clear didn’t comply?

      The certifier should have professional liability insurance – so they might be worth pursuing.  But it is possible that they did a “paper survey” – i.e. they made sure all the contractors had signed off on their work, possibly without even setting foot in the building.  The surveyors can then say they acted in good faith on the evidence that was available.  

      That means you then have to pursue the contractors who will, in all likelihood, declare their firm insolvent within hours of receiving your lawyers’ letter only to reopen next day under under another, very similar, business name.

      Getting back to the certifier – if you can prove they knew the work wasn’t compliant, then you’d have a case.  Talk to an experienced strata lawyer. Otherwise, you might be better off saving your money for the repairs.

      If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
      #24849 Reply

      Thanks…..

       

      I guess that the Council who issued the original Construction and Occupation Certificates will have an equivalent defence.

      The irony is that the Council who oversighted the development process is the one now likely to want to enforce compliance (a fire safety issue in this case – no dampers installed in exhaust ducts).

    Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
    Reply To: Dodgy Certification by Developer/Building – Who to Sue
    PLEASE ... If your property is not in NSW, mention its location (state). Don't identify companies or individuals by name. Don't mention or promote your company or services. Keep acronyms and initials to a minimum. Please, don’t use “quote” unless there is a specific point to which you wish to refer, then highlight (define) that specific passage before you click on "quote". Otherwise just use reply. THANKS.

    You can use BBCodes to format your content.
    Your account can't use all available BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

    Your information:




    Forums The Professionals Current Page