In 2008 my SP passed a motion to create a by-law. The motion was so poorly worded it could not be registered as a by-law. On the suggestion of the OCs' solicitor, the EC approved of the solicitor writing a by-law that matched the intent of the very poorly worded motion.
What the solicitor created is now registered as a by-law.

There are a few issues. The by-law appears to have been registered over 2 years after the original motion was passed which would be a breach of s48(2) of the Actand when the by-law was registered the solicitor need to state the date the resolution was passed. No resolution stating what was being registered was ever passed. The solicitor would have been aware of that given it was the solicitor who wrote the by-law.

This SP has been the subject of a s162 application but CTTT feels everything is in order. In the s162 application was a matter of two EC members and the solicitor registering a bylaw with the wrong attachment and the EC refusing, for years, to correct the mistake.

Where does one go when the EC are insufferably hopeless, the solicitor is dubious and CTTT are reluctant to show a little backbone?

Should i go back to CTTT with this new matter and hope things are put in order?  Why should an owner have to fork out for images of dealings and pay for applications when ultimately the problem is the OC does not have the personnel to self manage.

Wouldn't it be nice if i could just call the “strata police” and have them sort it out.