Forums Strata Committees Current Page

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #8815 Reply | Quote
    Felix
    Flatchatter

      What can one do if a motion is placed on the Agenda for an upcoming EC meeting where the details in the motion are completely false and derogatory to one of the Owners ?

    Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
    • Author
      Replies
    • #18389 Reply
      Jimmy-T
      Keymaster

        You could send a letter to the EC to be submitted at the meeting with a request that it be published with the minutes, pointing out the errors.

        You could also write to the EC telling them that the motion is defamatory and if they don’t withdraw it, you will sue (these days, strata insurances tend not to cover defamation claims).

        Or you could gather the signatures of one third of owners opposing the motion and asking for it to be removed from the agenda since no decision taken on it would be valid (due to one third of owner opposing it).

        If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
        #18394 Reply
        Sir Humphrey
        Flatchatter

          This question highlights for me one of the things that seems very foreign about NSW compared with the ACT. NSW has this requirement to post EC meeting agendas and minutes on a notice board but the ACT does not. As an EC member I am very glad that we (in the ACT) don’t have to do that. It gives us considerable freedom to discuss matters frankly and openly within the EC without (or at least before) matters getting to be a wider bun fight. Every OC will at times have people who get bees in their bonnets about something. If it is some dispute between neighbours it might be far better addressed quietly and discretely rather than broadcast before EC members have even had a chance to talk to the parties to work out what it is about. We tend to include a general overview of the matters the EC has dealt with in a newsletter but we present these as just a selection of news items; we can be a bit more discrete and leave out certain specifics (such as the particular unit) if it not something that people really need to know. We don’t pretend it is a transcript of the minutes but of course we do have proper minutes which anyone could get if they went to the managing agent’s office to inspect the books.

          I can think of a few owners who would have loved to have their unpleasant innuendo-laden correspondence to the EC published for them. 

          #18406 Reply

          Hi Felix,

          In my opinion your options are.,. find the idiot making the insinuations, complaints and ask them to make a formal apology in the next meeting, notice, minutes and or ask them to make a personal apology to the offended party before they take legal action. Depending on the issue, all parties could be sued in a defamation, heresay issue. So possibly a resident sued, then a committee sued then the owners corperation. ou could be %&*@

          Best RegardsCool

        Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
        Reply To: Agenda for EC meeting
        PLEASE ... If your property is not in NSW, mention its location (state). Don't identify companies or individuals by name. Don't mention or promote your company or services. Keep acronyms and initials to a minimum. Please, don’t use “quote” unless there is a specific point to which you wish to refer, then highlight (define) that specific passage before you click on "quote". Otherwise just use reply. THANKS.

        You can use BBCodes to format your content.
        Your account can't use all available BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

        Your information:




        Forums Strata Committees Current Page