The ups and downs of strata lift maintenance

iStock-1336279149-e1778671715227.jpg

Something seriously wrong here, but could it have been prevented?

There are few more despair-inducing sights in high rise apartment blocks than a lift “out of order” notice.

Make that “heartbreaking’ when your block has only one lift.  Yet, the reluctance to face up to the fact that they require maintenance is amazing.

I recall complaints from a couple of years back about a lift that would stop half a metre above or below the external door but the committee refused to have it repaired because “it still works fine” and the repairs would take it out of action completely.

All of which brings us to a  few thoughts on the matter from Adam Daly, Modernisation Director at KONE Australia and New Zealand. We were invited to ask him questions about lift maintenance. This is his response:

When people think about lifts, it’s usually only when something goes wrong. Yet in apartment buildings – especially mid- and high-rise – lifts are essential infrastructure, affecting daily convenience, accessibility, property value and even safety. Planning ahead is the key to avoiding unpleasant surprises.

Most passenger lifts are designed to last 20–30 years, sometimes longer, depending on how they are used, maintained and modernised over time. That doesn’t mean everything works perfectly until year 30 and then suddenly fails. In reality, different components age at different rates, and performance can gradually decline if investment doesn’t keep pace.

For strata plans, meaningful planning should start well before a lift reaches the end of its design life. From around the 15–20-year mark, it’s sensible to assess condition, usage patterns and future needs. Older buildings often experience more frequent breakdowns, difficulty sourcing spare parts, higher energy use and poorer ride quality – all of which can frustrate residents and increase costs over time.

Regular, well-planned maintenance plays an important role in ensuring and potentially extending the lifecycle of the equipment. While no lift lasts forever, proactive maintenance helps identify wear early, reduces unexpected breakdowns and allows owners to schedule upgrades in a controlled way rather than reacting in a crisis. In practice, that usually means fewer major failures, shorter downtime and better reliability for residents.

Technology has also shifted significantly over the past two decades. Lifts today are far more connected and data-driven than those installed in the early 2000s. Continuous 24/7 connectivity provides better performance using artificial intelligence where many faults can be diagnosed proactively and much faster, and maintenance that is based on actual usage rather than guesswork.

For building owners, this translates into more uptime of the equipment, more transparency, quicker response times and better information to support long-term decisions. Energy efficiency, ride comfort, safety systems and accessibility have all advanced at the same time.

Some warning signs that a lift may be heading toward trouble include more frequent call-outs, longer shutdowns, noisy/poor operation, doors sticking or mis-levelling at floors. These are typically indicators that components are reaching the end of their reliable life and should prompt a broader conversation about future options, not just the next repair.

Modernisation doesn’t always mean tearing everything out at once. In many cases, lifts can be upgraded in stages to spread cost and minimise disruption. Even in a 15-storey building, a full renovation is usually measured in weeks rather than months, with careful planning to minimise impact to tenants. 

Cost is understandably a concern for owners and residents. There is no meaningful “per floor, per year” average that applies across all buildings, because maintenance and upgrade costs depend heavily on age, technology, usage, environment and service expectations.

What matters more than a headline figure is predictability – understanding likely future investment, avoiding emergency spend, and ensuring money is directed toward reliability, safety and resident experience.

Finally, lift outages aren’t just inconvenient. In residential buildings they can raise accessibility, safety and legal issues, particularly where residents rely on lifts for mobility or emergency access. That’s why forward planning, transparency and informed decision-making are so important.

Lifts may be out of sight, but they shouldn’t be out of mind. Treating them as long-term assets – with data, planning and timely investment – is the best way to ensure buildings remain liveable, accessible and resilient for decades to come. 

Newsletter

To subscribe (for free) to our weekly Flat Chat newsletter, bringing you links to our  latest posts, just click HERE.

Forums Current Page

  • This topic has 3 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 4 months ago by .
  • Creator
    Topic
  • #83904 Reply | Quote
    Jimmy-T
    Keymaster

      Lift maintencae is expensive and can be disruptive, but breakdowns are a distater. So, when do you fix it if it aint broke?

      [See the full post at: The ups and downs of strata lift maintenance]

      If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
    Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
    • Author
      Replies
    • #83935 Reply
      dyden2099
      Flatchatter

        When our lift provider suggested a full replacement at a cost of $260k, the committee engaged an independent lift consultant. After assessing the equipment, the consultant confirmed that replacement was necessary.

        However, the consultant also identified specific maintenance failures that had been causing the frequent breakdowns. Following their intervention with the service provider, call-outs were reduced to zero.

        At the consultant’s suggestion, the committee further engaged them to tender the project to several companies and manage the selection process. They subsequently reported back with an assessment of the bids based on their professional experience with each firm.

        Based on this advice—taking into account cost, estimated construction time, building design, and the consultant’s track record with the bidders—we accepted a tender that was $100k less than the one provided by our existing lift company (even though their new bid was significantly lower than their original quote).

        The project was managed by the consultant and completed six months later, including a two-month period where the building was without a lift. Notably, the new system eliminated the need for the lift motor room above the top floor. This reclaimed space may now be used to house batteries for solar panels—but that’s a story for another time.

        #83939 Reply
        imaynotbeperfect
        Flatchatter

          When our lift provider suggested a full replacement at a cost of $260k, the committee engaged an independent lift consultant. After assessing the equipment, the consultant confirmed that replacement was necessary.

          However, the consultant also identified specific maintenance failures that had been causing the frequent breakdowns. Following their intervention with the service provider, call-outs were reduced to zero.

           

          We did likewise a few years ago when we, (an 8-storey building) came to replace our 30 year old lift.  We used a list consultant based in St Leonards, NSW from narrowing down just what options we needed, to running the tender, evaluating the responses and recommending who to go with and then signing off at the end of the job.  He was especially useful in cutting through the red tape where lift regulations meet fire regulations, an area none of us had a clue about.  Worth every penny of his fees.

          #83942 Reply
          UberOwner
          Flatchatter

            I wish I knew about lift consultants when we replaced our lift a few years ago! We are a small block of six, so a new lift is a big expense for us with only six owners to bear the cost. We saved for that lift through increased levies over a three year period. One of our owners took on the price negotiations and we got the lift for $160K. Eight weeks with no lift – so difficult for the elderly people in the building. And then the new lift kept breaking down. We were so disappointed. That’s when we learned how far down the priority list we were for call-outs. Hospitals and nursing homes get first preference behind people actually stuck in a lift. Then big towers. Small blocks with elderly residents just don’t get attention. The entire service system was automated with no people to speak with. We ended up with residents lying in wait in the basement in case a technician turned up, trying to make contact with anyone who would talk with us about what was going wrong. One of our residents was getting maintenance quotes from other companies (we were still within our year of free maintenance).

            Finally someone encountered an actual technician and explained how poorly the new lift was performing and he looked beyond the “get it going again” approach and discovered a serious fault with our mother-board, which was replaced (that took three months). Lift has been brilliant ever since.
            At the end of our year of free maintenance, we were very reluctant to sign up with that company and suddenly actual humans started to talk to us. We were able to negotiate the pricing and the terms of the standard contract for the first 12 months and we got an exit clause added to allow us to get out of the contract without penalty if the lift continued to behave poorly (which it hasn’t). I now have email and phone contacts for actual people in our lift company.

            I worry about the numbers of people moving into apartments in our cities and how many of them are not equipped to manage projects of this size, fight for their rights, negotiate contracts or pay for expensive consultants and lawyers to look after their interests.

             

          Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
          Reply To: The ups and downs of strata lift maintenance
          PLEASE ... If your property is not in NSW, mention its location (state). Don't identify companies or individuals by name. Don't mention or promote your company or services. Keep acronyms and initials to a minimum. Please, don’t use “quote” unless there is a specific point to which you wish to refer, then highlight (define) that specific passage before you click on "quote". Otherwise just use reply. THANKS.

          You can use BBCodes to format your content.
          Your account can't use all available BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

          Your information:




          Forums Current Page

          Forums Current Page

          scroll to top