- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 months, 3 weeks ago by .
-
Topic
-
I recently moved into a new development. My neighbour got a locksmith out to quote on installing a deadlock on the door.
The locksmith noticed that a tag on the door frame had been painted over by the developer’s painters. He said that this should have caused the building to not have been certified…
Who should fix this? The building manager or the developer?
There seems to be a pattern emerging of badly finished work. What is the best way to deal with this?
-
Replies
-
Remember the building manager works for the OC so if he pays, it ends up that the OC pays.
I had a similar situation where on first inspection after the first AGM the fire assessor found a number of defects. Like yours they were there prior or handover.
We contacted the developer and pointed out that these were defects and he got onto the builder who fixed the defects to the fire certifies satisfaction.
I think in the current climate where the building commissioner is holding builders and developers more accountable, it would be hard for either to hide behind the private certifier. (Private certifiers these days have to do more than just accept compliance statements from the tradies. They need to do site inspections as well)
- This reply was modified 9 months, 3 weeks ago by .
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.