Tagged: 

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #36532 Reply | Quote
    dwa
    Flatchatter

      Hi,

      Recently, owners were notified of our upcoming AGM.  The issue is that notification was by email which was received a day later than required for the WA-legislated 14 days notice of such things. Therefore the notification was received 13 days before the AGM.

      Despite notifying our Strata Managers of this basic error, it seems as if they intend to proceed with the AGM.

      Consequently, I’m curious as to the ramifications of such a meeting should it proceed.  No budget approved is one, but since the COO (EC) wouldn’t be valid, this seems of little consequence.  Even with a quorum, by-laws would not be valid?  Are there others?

      Many thanks in advance,

      DA

    Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
    • Author
      Replies
    • #36544 Reply
      Jimmy-T
      Keymaster

        Not sure about how things work in WA but elsewhere you might find that it makes no difference unless someone is
        “breached” under the by-laws and challenges the complaint on the grounds that the by-law wasn’t validly passed.

        You could fix that later with another general meeting held specifically to endorse the by-laws agreed upon at the AGM. However the current law and future laws say that decisions made at a meeting where there was  accidental failure to give proper notice, still stand. I think most authorities would accept that missing by a day was accidental.

        Schedule 1, Section 11 (5) of the WA Strata Titles Act 1985 says this:

        … accidental omission to give the notice to any proprietor or to any registered first mortgagee or non-receipt of the notice by any proprietor or by any registered first mortgagee does not invalidate any proceedings at any such [general] meeting.

        Section 129 (3) of the new WA strata act says this:

        Accidental omission to give notice of a general meeting to the owner or first mortgagee of a lot or non-receipt of the notice by the owner or first mortgagee of a lot does not invalidate any proceedings at the meeting.

        By the way,  the new Act has been passed but not proclaimed as yet, as they are waiting for the supporting regulations to be approved.  This is scheduled to happen in the third quarter of this year.  So it’s not law but it does indicate where the law is going.

        In summary, it would be a brave and possibly foolish owner who decided to ignore the decisions made at the meeting  because the notice was a day overdue.

        You can read all about WA’s impending strata reforms HERE.

        If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
        #36547 Reply
        dwa
        Flatchatter
        Chat-starter

          Brilliant!

          I am aware of the impending Strata Act reforms.

          It sounds like any challenge would depend on what constitutes an accident.

          Many thanks for your insights.

        Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
        Reply To: Are AGM decisions valid if meeting notice was late?
        PLEASE ... If your property is not in NSW, mention its location (state). Don't identify companies or individuals by name. Don't mention or promote your company or services. Keep acronyms and initials to a minimum. Please, don’t use “quote” unless there is a specific point to which you wish to refer, then highlight (define) that specific passage before you click on "quote". Otherwise just use reply. THANKS.

        You can use BBCodes to format your content.
        Your account can't use all available BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

        Your information: