Forums Pets: Furry friends … or fiends? Current Page

  • This topic has 2 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 6 years ago by .
  • Creator
    Topic
  • #51652 Reply | Quote
    questionmaster
    Flatchatter

      Hi Jimmy,

      We have a by law that states;

      “a) An owner or occupier of a lot must not keep a dog on the lot or common property

      b) An owner or occupier of a lot, must not without the approval in writing of the Owners Corporation, keep any other animal on the lot or common property”.

      We would like to know your thoughts on this, and the discrimination against dogs specifically.

      As contemporary living standards are continuing to change and there is continuous growth in strata living in Australia, we would like to see the community we live in adapt. The current by law is unbalanced and does not involve or permit sensible consideration of the interest and needs of ALL lot owners or occupiers and only operates in the interest of those owners who are opposed to dog ownership.

      We have taken this to our latest AGM asking for a special resolution to amend the by law to include dog ownership, and suggested rules in place as well as having to be approved via the committee as what is currently in place (with cats) however this was not passed due to 25% against the motion.

      How do you think we should handle this moving forward?

    Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
    • Author
      Replies
    • #51742 Reply
      Jimmy-T
      Keymaster

        Yes, well, strata law specifies that by-laws may not be discriminatory and I’m suprised someone hasn’t trotted off to NCAT to challenge your by-law on that basis (if only for a bit of fun).

        Perhaps discrimination between cats and dogs doesn’t make the threshold but what about cat owners and dog lovers.

        People will say that allowing dogs into your block leaves you open to everything from sleepless nights to rabies.

        But, as I never tire of saying , there is specific legislation in the strata Act, namely section 158, which covers animals that have been allowed under a scheme’s by-laws but later prove to be a nuisance, hazard or interfere with residents peaceful enjoyment of their home.

        So, when people say “what if someone has a yappy dog that drives us nuts” the answer is “Section 158”.  Could it be that simple? In strata, anything is possible.

        If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
        #51755 Reply
        Mailbox
        Flatchatter

          You need to discuss the nightmare that is living in an apartment building with animals that can make you die, should you come in contact with their hair.

          This is pet lovers versus death and hospitlisations.  It is discriminatory to those with asthma and allergies for the sake of a few spoilt individuals who are cruel to their animals.

        Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
        Reply To: Reply #51742 in Cats OK but dogs banned – is this discrimination?
        PLEASE ... If your property is not in NSW, mention its location (state). Don't identify companies or individuals by name. Don't mention or promote your company or services. Keep acronyms and initials to a minimum. Please, don’t use “quote” unless there is a specific point to which you wish to refer, then highlight (define) that specific passage before you click on "quote". Otherwise just use reply. THANKS.

        You can use BBCodes to format your content.
        Your account can't use all available BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

        Your information:




        Forums Pets: Furry friends … or fiends? Current Page