Forums Parking Peeves Current Page

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #9514 Reply | Quote
    Paddy
    Flatchatter

      I am an owner in a block of 20 townhouses with attached garages.  6 of these townhouses have garages on the street frontage.  The garages are set back 5 metres from the footpath, accessed by a paved driveway or “apron”.  These aprons are deemed to be common property on the registered plan and standard by-law 2 therefore applies.  There are also 4 townhouses with an apron from the private road which services the remaining 14 townhouses.

      At an EC meeting a few years ago permission was granted for residents to park their cars “from time to time” on their respective apron.  One of the owners (who does not have an apron) is continually agitating for the permission to be reversed, claiming that parking in the area is valuable and those residents should be paying the OC a fee for parking.  8 of the 10 garages have been utilised by the residents for storage.

      Am exclusive use by-law was proposed last year at an EGM but did not achieve the 75% approval vote.

      The issue appears to be one of common sense.  Despite the designation of the apron as “common property” only the resident can use it (to access their garage).

      Would it be possible/practical for the relevant owners to apply to NCAT for a ruling?

    Reply To: Reply #21625 in Driveway parking
    PLEASE ... If your property is not in NSW, mention its location (state). Don't identify companies or individuals by name. Don't mention or promote your company or services. Keep acronyms and initials to a minimum. Please, don’t use “quote” unless there is a specific point to which you wish to refer, then highlight (define) that specific passage before you click on "quote". Otherwise just use reply. THANKS.

    You can use BBCodes to format your content.
    Your account can't use all available BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

    Your information:




    Forums Parking Peeves Current Page