Forums From the Front Page Current Page

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #83732 Reply | Quote
    Jimmy-T
    Keymaster

      Does a leak in your unit block roof mean your entire waterproofing needs to be replaced in one massive hit? Some contractors say it does.

      [See the full post at: Is rooftop waterproofing the latest strata scam?]

      If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
    Viewing 4 replies - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
    • Author
      Replies
    • #83733 Reply
      Mailbox
      Flatchatter

        I own a unit in a block of 16 units. Haven’t had too many problems as we have a very good/diligent Strata Committee.

        This building was completed in 2000 approx but we have had some water ingress problems. We have found out that the waterproofing wasn’t approved by council as no application was sent to them and therefore didn’t appear on any Strata Committee Minutes.

        We have employed engineers and after 3 quotes I have been given an approx cost of $200,000 per unit which is way beyond my budget! The other unit owners are also concerned as they too will have financial problems.

        We don’t have any recourse with the builder as he is not around anymore. I don’t know if it is “overkill”. Tiles  ripped up, scaffolding erected for all floors because other externals are not compliant.

        Engineers  have presented at meetings and seem to be ok but I wouldn’t know. The other owners  seem to be  knowledgeable and have asked questions of the engineers, which have been answered, but $3.2 million for a leaky roof and related issues seems excessive.

        #83742 Reply
        Strata Ken
        Flatchatter

          The only solution is for the building commissioner to look at some of the reports and remediation plans by engineers and the costing from builders and determine if these are reasonable. The previous comment has been asked for $200k per unit, when a typical unit build cost is about $500k. I’m starting to think that $200k per unit is standard fee for builders, or maybe for small unit blocks they make it about $3m for the total.

          #83744 Reply
          Jimmy-T
          Keymaster
          Chat-starter

            I’m wondering if this is one of those cases where mandatory maintenance projects are piled on to owners so that they are persuaded to sell to a developer. There’s one crook going around the Eastern suburbs of Sydney doing exactly that.  He’s buying into blocks in need of repair, reporting them to council for fire safety non-compliance, and NCAT for failure to repair common property, then buying the units off frightened owners at (literally) knock-down prices, then selling to developers for demolition at a massive profit.  It’s not illegal – he’s using the letter of the law – but immoral to the nth degree.

            Maybe in this case the building is a bit too new for that – but if it’s on a chunk of prime real estate, who knows?

            If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
            #83807 Reply
            Jimmy-T
            Keymaster
            Chat-starter

              My post on this on Linken-in got 2,128 Impressions (whatever that means) and reached 1,420 members. Meanwhile, there’s another example of this knee-jerk, high-cost and unnecessary reaction to any leaks in any building HERE.

              A few thoughts for committee members facing this dilemma:

              1. Just because your building is more than 20 years old, it doesn’t mean your waterproofing has failed or will do so any time soon.

              2. Just because you water proofing is leaking, it doesn’t mean it can’t be repaired.

              3. Just because there is water ingress when it rains, it doesn’t mean it’s coming from the roof.

              Strata buildings are complex – anyone who comes up with a one-size-fits-all response to water proofing problems is probably having a lend. The Building Commission needs to get on top of this before we’re in another strata insurance kickbacks or embedded network scandal.

              If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
            Viewing 4 replies - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
            Reply To: Reply #83807 in Is rooftop waterproofing the latest strata scam?
            PLEASE ... If your property is not in NSW, mention its location (state). Don't identify companies or individuals by name. Don't mention or promote your company or services. Keep acronyms and initials to a minimum. Please, don’t use “quote” unless there is a specific point to which you wish to refer, then highlight (define) that specific passage before you click on "quote". Otherwise just use reply. THANKS.

            You can use BBCodes to format your content.
            Your account can't use all available BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

            Your information:




            Forums From the Front Page Current Page