Paving Rejected by Community Scheme

› Forums › Talkin’ ’bout a renovation › Current Page

Create New Reply
  • Creator
    Topic
  • 23/09/2017 at 12:46 pm #11352 Reply | Quote
    Renocamp

      We own a townhouse in NSW with a courtyard and decided to replace some pavers. We did not get approval as thought that would only apply if we were adding a pegola or awning. Half way during the works we were ordered to stop by strata committee. We did immediately and lodged the relevant forms. We have been rejected by the community scheme who say the colour pavers we chose are not keeping with the aesthetics of the complex. The pavers are grey and match the door frames and the form filled out did say grey pavers to be used. Our courtyard is surrounded by hedges and can only be seen if close to our gate.  The bylaws do not mention specific materials just with keeping with the look of the complex. We feel their objection is subjective on aesthetics and unreasonable. What options do we have to repeal this as pavers are down but not cemented. Any help appreciated. Also pavers originally down along with neighbouring townhouses are a mismatch of greys.

    • Creator
      Topic
    Reply To: Reply #28222 in Paving Rejected by Community Scheme
    PLEASE ... If your property is not in NSW, mention its location (state). Don't identify companies or individuals by name. Don't mention or promote your company or services. Keep acronyms and initials to a minimum. Please, don’t use “quote” unless there is a specific point to which you wish to refer, then highlight (define) that specific passage before you click on "quote". Otherwise just use reply. THANKS.

    You can use BBCodes to format your content.
    Your account can't use all available BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

    Your information:




    › Forums › Talkin’ ’bout a renovation › Current Page