Forums Strata Committees Current Page

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #79173 Reply | Quote
    Gloucester19
    Flatchatter

      Being in a new apartment development in the Victorian capital for the first time, I’ve found the first strata committee to be composed of developer employees (the majority) and owners, all elected by a tonne of proxies. How long, please, are developers and their apparent proxy allies allowed to remain on the committee? How long must we face developer proxies?  Hopefully not until we reach the end of the developer liability periods for owners.  One solution now, if we’re still stuck with developer employees, is to move at the coming AGM to increase the OC-authorised committee size to the maximum to obtain committee seats, hopefully, for some independent owners. Is this a plausible idea or might the developer just fill up the extra seats with employees and owner allies using proxies?

    Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
    • Author
      Replies
    • #79180 Reply
      Jimmy-T
      Keymaster

        First of all, check who the proxy votes were and how they were allocated. In Victoria, as elsewhere, proxy holders are emtiled to one proxy for buildingings of 20 lots or fewer or  up to 5 per cent of the number of units.

        For instance, if your building has 95 units, then proxy holders would be entitled to four proxy votes each if you have 150 units then it would be seven each (since you can’t have part votes).

        The reality is that your four developer stooges can’t have more than 20 percent of the vote.  Your challenge is to get more than 20 percent voting to replace them at the next AGM (if not before).

        So you could challenge the last election, if proxies were misused in some way, or just campaign with owners to change things and get more than 20 per cent of the vote in support.

             89D   Restriction on number of lot owners on behalf of whom a proxy may vote on a resolution

        (1)  A person must not vote as a proxy on a resolution at a meeting of the owners corporation—

        (a)  on behalf of more than one lot owner—if there are 20 or less occupiable lots on the plan of subdivision; or

        (b)  on behalf of more than 5% of the lot owners—if there are more than 20 occupiable lots on the plan of subdivision.

        (2)  Subsection (1) does not apply if—

        (a)  the lot owners for whom the person is authorised to vote on behalf of are members of that person’s family; or

        (b)  the person votes as a proxy in the prescribed circumstances.

        There is another potential avenue – and you really need to talk to an experienced strata lawyer about this. If you had any evidence of misuse of their power, in terms of favouring the developer to the detriment of the owners, you might consider invoking Section 117 (1c) and (2) to argue that the developers representatives have an inbuilt conflict of interest by holding a majority on the committee, their collective power going beyond an advisory capacity.

        117 Duties of members of committees and sub‑committees

        (1)  A member of a committee or sub-committee of an owners corporation must, in the performance of the member’s functions—    (c)  act in the interests of the owners corporation.

        (2)  A member of a committee or sub-committee of an owners corporation must not make improper use of the member’s position to gain, directly or indirectly, an advantage for the member or for any other person.

        You might then apply to VCAT under section 165 (1)(h)

        165 What orders can VCAT make?

        (1)  In determining an owners corporation dispute, VCAT may make any order it considers fair including one or more of the following—

        (h) an order appointing (with the person’s consent) or revoking the appointment of—

        (i)  the chairperson of the owners corporation;

        (ii)  the secretary of the owners corporation;

        (iii)  a member of a committee or sub‑committee of the owners corporation;

        Again, I would stress that you need to talkto an experienced strata lawyer.

        And finally, albeit at the risk of a backlash from your fellow owners, there’s always the media, as per this similar story from the Age online: Melbourne property: Adrian bought a glamorous new home in Southbank’s Normanby building. Then there was a $3000-a-year catch

         

        If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
        #79191 Reply
        Gloucester19
        Flatchatter
        Chat-starter

          Thank you very much Mr T for this guide.

        Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
        Reply To: Reply #79180 in VICTORIA: Developer nominees on strata committee
        PLEASE ... If your property is not in NSW, mention its location (state). Don't identify companies or individuals by name. Don't mention or promote your company or services. Keep acronyms and initials to a minimum. Please, don’t use “quote” unless there is a specific point to which you wish to refer, then highlight (define) that specific passage before you click on "quote". Otherwise just use reply. THANKS.

        You can use BBCodes to format your content.
        Your account can't use all available BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

        Your information:




        Forums Strata Committees Current Page