SC review of by-laws

› Forums › Strata Committees › Current Page

Create New Reply
  • Creator
    Topic
  • 31/01/2018 at 4:48 pm #11562 Reply | Quote
    tonydoss

      Hi

      as you know, we were required to review by-laws by 30 Nov.

      we are a 12-lot building in NSW. I’m part of the SC (only 2 people on the SC).

      I’ve sent my recommendation to the Strata Manager on 04 Oct, cc’ing the rest of the SC: use the model by-laws with default options for keeping of animals and smoking.

      The other SC member sent his to the SM (without cc’ing me). Now I get the agenda for the next AGM and see that the “SC recommendations” are his, including a no-pet by-law.

      Why the SM attached the other SC member recommendations and not mine, I don’t know.

      Clearly, this recommendation reflects that of ONE person (the person’s email even says “I have reviewed…”) and not that of the SC.

      What can I do? Request the SM to update the agenda and attach my recommendations ? What if he doesn’t want to? Do I have any options to make him comply?

      Thanks

    • Creator
      Topic
    Reply To: Reply #29113 in SC review of by-laws
    PLEASE ... If your property is not in NSW, mention its location (state). Don't identify companies or individuals by name. Don't mention or promote your company or services. Keep acronyms and initials to a minimum. Please, don’t use “quote” unless there is a specific point to which you wish to refer, then highlight (define) that specific passage before you click on "quote". Otherwise just use reply. THANKS.

    You can use BBCodes to format your content.
    Your account can't use all available BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

    Your information:




    › Forums › Strata Committees › Current Page