Forums Parking Peeves Current Page

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #11244 Reply | Quote
    Bowerbird
    Flatchatter

      There are five votes on our committee. The chair (one vote) asked for exclusive use of the one visitor carspace 9-5 mon-fri. The business (two votes) voted in favour. The residents (two votes) voted against.

      Then the business asked for exclusive use of the common toilets. The chair voted for and the residents voted against. An obvious case of collusion with full backing from the strata manager.

      The council came and had a look and declared the visitor car space permission to be invalid due to planning. Our lawyer has advised action against and removal of both the chair and strata manager which I am keen to get happening asap.

      Before pressing go I’m keen to get a second opinion on whether or not a vote or a bylaw trumps council in this instance?

    Reply To: Reply #27633 in Visitor park voted exclusive use for committee chairperson
    PLEASE ... If your property is not in NSW, mention its location (state). Don't identify companies or individuals by name. Don't mention or promote your company or services. Keep acronyms and initials to a minimum. Please, don’t use “quote” unless there is a specific point to which you wish to refer, then highlight (define) that specific passage before you click on "quote". Otherwise just use reply. THANKS.

    You can use BBCodes to format your content.
    Your account can't use all available BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

    Your information:




    Forums Parking Peeves Current Page