• Creator
    Topic
  • #56806 Reply | Quote
    alfredo
    Flatchatter

      Our SC intends to put forward (as requested by majority owners) an AGM motion whereby the maintenance and replacement of windows and balcony sliding doors is proposed to change from common property to lot owner’s property i.e. the cost is to be borne by the lot owner.

      Would an ordinary resolution (majority vote) suffice or does it require to be a special resolution (75% for) motion?

      Read through the ACT and could not find the answer to the above. Can someone please let me know of the link?

      While you are kind enough to respond, would painting the external surface of the entire block require an ordinary or a special resolution?

    Viewing 4 replies - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
    • Author
      Replies
    • #56830 Reply
      kaindub
      Flatchatter

        What is being proposed is an exclusive use by law.

        There are two hurdles to jump.

        The first is that no more than 25% of the votes cast can oppose this by law

        The second is that for an exclusive use by law, the OC must get written consent from every affected owner.

        The second hurdle is the tough one, because if one owner objects then the bylaw can’t be registered.

         

        #56832 Reply
        Jimmy-T
        Keymaster

          The second hurdle is the tough one, because if one owner objects then the bylaw can’t be registered.

          Correct.  So, in effect, a unanimous vote is required (even though you only need a special resolution to pass a by-law). I think this would fall under Section 143 and Section 144 of the Act.

           

          If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
          #56833 Reply
          Jimmy-T
          Keymaster

            Painting the block would only need a general resolution and could even be approved by the committee unless you were radically changing the look of the block.

            If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
            #56845 Reply
            alfredo
            Flatchatter
            Chat-starter

              Thank you good people.

            Viewing 4 replies - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
            Reply To: Majority wants to transfer responsibility for common property to owners
            PLEASE ... If your property is not in NSW, mention its location (state). Don't identify companies or individuals by name. Don't mention or promote your company or services. Keep acronyms and initials to a minimum. Please, don’t use “quote” unless there is a specific point to which you wish to refer, then highlight (define) that specific passage before you click on "quote". Otherwise just use reply. THANKS.

            You can use BBCodes to format your content.
            Your account can't use all available BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

            Your information: