Forum Replies Created

Viewing 4 replies - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • in reply to: Brell quits top SCA roles as Netstrata saga rolls on #73344
    Level_one
    Flatchatter

      I would suggest that the SCA may be incapable of cleaning up its act so the need for an independent review of the sector has never been more important than now.  A necessary outcome would be the development of a balanced Strata Management Contract perhaps with annual reporting of KPI’s.  The number of Strata that individual Managers are required to manage by the larger corporates guarantees that a reasonable level of service is most likely impossible.

      The Consolidation of the industry appears to be driven by maximising the returns to shareholders rather than servicing the client (Even in meeting the terms of the SCA contract ,which is not a high bar for the providers)

      Consideration could also be given to a model where the Strata owns the licence for a management platform and so retains all its records for a seamless transfer to another management agency.   At this time the lack of portability in changing Strata Managers is used as an anchor to retain clients.  The Building Management sector now has the option for Strata to own the licence and delegate to the contracted building manager.  Perhaps the time has come that all the reasons as to why this cannot be done for Strata Management need to be solved rather than being used as an excuse.

      I expect any independent review will need to employ more staff than anticipated to deal with all the submissions from Flat Chat, Owners Corporation Network and the many Strata that have been disadvantaged by the SCA model over many years.

      Perhaps the time has come for the Government to fund the Owners Corporation Network via the Strata Commission? so it is not dependent on funding from commercial organisations with vested interest.  The Tenants Union receives funding from the Government so it can be done for a not for profit organisation.

      Regards Stephen.

       

      in reply to: Doctor sells electric car after EV charging blocked #62554
      Level_one
      Flatchatter

        Thanks for the follow up. We should all be on the same page trying to ensure all Lot Owners have access to EV charging facilities as in the years to come they will all need it.

        We had a situation very similar to the Dr’s in our building where a Lot Owner placed an order for a Tesla with the intention of using the door opener power circuit to charge without seeking any approval. He did then indicate he would be happy to re-imburse an estimate of the power usage but got very little support from the vast majority of Lot Owners to do this.

        I did raise at an OCN webinar whether we could use the A/C compressor power existing in the basement garages for EV Charging and Ross De Rango who was then at NHP picked up on this and developed an EV readiness box that can be used to monitor the load on the relevant circuit and use the power for either the Air Conditioner or EV charging but not both. This box can also be configured for use where the Lot Owners Meter is in the basement garage which may be a more common application. Not sure whether the installation of cable trays though the entire basement might be considered a minor modification to enable these options but some buildings might require the addition of cable trays to comply with AS3000. We now have bylaws in place in our building that enable all Lot Owners to source their own metered power for EV changing providing they have an appropriate interlock/load management module. (approx $1000)

        So the message really is rather than provide a band aid solution that will benefit perhaps a couple of privileged users look at a whole of building solution. It may mean you have to make an annual provision in a capital works program to get there down the track.

        We have had another building in our Community that has made the case that providing EV charging facilities in their building will enhance the value of individual apartments and they have implemented a whole of building solution for an approx cost of $1200 per lot across 30 Apartments where there is currently only one EV user.

        As indicated in other Strata even where an EV charger installation using Lot Owners power has been proposed with all costs  totally paid for by the Lot Owner it has not been able to achieve 50% support at a meeting so education of the uniformed is perhaps the first priority rather than an easy fix.

        Perhaps the new NSW Strata Hub needs to have an indication of whether the Strata is “EV Ready” or not. If this could come in from the 1st of July it might provide an incentive for Strata to be proactive. 

        in reply to: Doctor sells electric car after EV charging blocked #62545
        Level_one
        Flatchatter

          It would appear I need to clarify my previous post as I have been actively involved with looking at a wide range of solutions to assist Strata install EV charging across our entire Community of some 55 Strata and unmanaged use of common property power as in this example we would consider one of the least desirable routes to go and not to be encouraged. Certainly for one user it might appear as a simple solution but is not a long term solution and when proposed here has not even had enough support to be passed under Section 132B. It would appear I need to note that I am a Lot Owner as part of a team looking to develop guidelines to assist Strata in providing EV charging facilities within our Community and have been dealing with many of these issues at the “Coal Face”.

          Generally the design load and usage factor on an individual common property supply can be very limited. In our case the power available in the garage circuit is designed primarily to operate the garage door openers and it is assumed all will not be operating at the same time. This circuit has to power 32 door openers which is fine if only a small percentage are being used at any one time.  To use such a circuit for multiple EV chargers is not likely to be sustainable.

          I would also suggest that expecting that all users with unmanaged access to the common property supply will confine there charging to off peak times is optimistic. Bear in mind that any power usage that impacts on the capacity charge for your common property supply takes 12 months to work itself out of the billing cycle so even if you had 3 chargers working  simultaneously for only 5 minutes in peak period it can impact on the billing for the next 12 months.  If the peak capacity charge is impacted by even one EV charger this reports to the Owners Corporation irrespective of whether the user pays for the specific kW used for charging. Refer to Ausgrid for the calculation of the Peak Capacity charge.

          There are a wide range of solutions from relatively simple to more complex that ensure that EV charging can be retrofitted without any negative impact on the existing power supply to the overall complex and also ensure that user pays for power which is in the best interest of all Lot Owners. Buildings have already experienced brownouts with the installation of induction cooktops and so the emphasis of being able to install chargers without any increase to the design load is a key factor in getting approval.  Connecting chargers without load management into the common property supply is not seen as a way to help allay the fears of the uniformed.

          In my particular case we have both air conditioning compressors and Lot Owners meters located in the basement garage and with the appropriate interlocks the Lot Owner can use his own metered power within the design capacity of his supply to charge his EV. An excellent solution where available as 100% Lot Owner funded and 100% paid for on his own electricity bill and no impact on the OC peak capacity charge.

          This may require a bylaw to run cabling through common property from the meter/compressor to his garage but this option can be a totally user pays model and relatively inexpensive to implement considering the benefits to both the Lot Owner and the Owners Corporation. In many cases within our Community it is not possible to even get a 50% vote at a meeting because of concerns raised by non-informed owners about the risks associated with EV charging. These can be financial risks associated with the use of common property power but more commonly the impact on insurance premiums of which I am unaware of any facts to support this concern.

          Certainly in other cases where access to the Lot Owners metered power is not available a more sophisticated common property system might be required but even in this situation for a relatively small expenditure by the Owners Corporation there are options to install EV charging without any negative impact on the overall building supply.

          For the currently available information relating to NSW refer

          Refer https://www.energysaver.nsw.gov.au/reducing-emissions-nsw/electric-vehicles/electric-vehicle-ready-buildings

          If you reference this link you will find an extensive source of information to assist all those looking forward to be able to provide EV charging facilities to the majority of their residents.

          in reply to: Doctor sells electric car after EV charging blocked #62518
          Level_one
          Flatchatter

            We are currently encouraging the introduction of EV charging facilities across our entire Community of some 55 Strata and unmanaged use of common property power as in this example we would consider one of the least desirable routes to go and not to be encouraged. It would appear I need to note that I am a Lot Owner as part of a team looking to develop guidelines to assist Strata in providing EV charging facilities within our Community and have been dealing with many of these issues at the “Coal Face”.

            Generally the design load and usage factor on a common property supply can be very limited. In our case the power available in the garage is designed primarily to operate the garage door openers and it is assumed all will not be operating at the same time. This circuit has to power 32 door openers which is fine if only a small percentage are being used at any one time.  To use such a circuit for multiple EV chargers is not likely to be sustainable.

            I would also suggest that expecting that all users will confine there charging to off peak times is optimistic. Bear in mind that any power usage that impacts on the capacity charge for your common property supply takes 12 months to work itself out of the billing cycle so even if you had 3 chargers working  simultaneously for only 5 minutes in peak period it can impact on the billing for the next 12 months.  If the peak capacity charge is impacted by even one EV charger this reports to the Owners Corporation irrespective of whether the user pays for the kW used for charging. Refer to Ausgrid for the calculation of the Peak Capacity charge.

            There are a wide range of solutions from relatively simple to more complex that ensure that EV charging can be retrofitted without any negative impact on the existing power supply to the overall complex and also ensure that user pays for power which is in the best interest of all Lot Owners. Buildings have already experienced brownouts with the installation of induction cooktops and so the emphasis of being able to install chargers without any increase to the design load is a key factor in getting approval.  Connecting chargers without load management into the common property supply is not seen as a way to help allay the fears of the uniformed.

            The NSW DPIE will shortly be releasing a document that has been prepared in conjunction with the OCN that will outline many of the available options.

            DPIE – Technical Guidelines for Making Residential Buildings EV- ready

            In my particular case we have both air conditioning compressors and Lot Owners meters located in the basement garage and with the appropriate interlocks the Lot Owner can use his own metered power within the design capacity of his supply to charge his EV. An excellent solution where available as 100% Lot Owner funded and 100% paid for on his own electricity bill and no impact on the OC peak capacity charge.

            This may require a bylaw to run cabling through common property from the meter/compressor to his garage but this option can be a totally user pays model and relatively inexpensive to implement considering the benefits to both the Lot Owner and the Owners Corporation. In many cases within our Community it is not possible to even get a 50% vote at a meeting because of concerns raised by non-informed owners about the risks associated with EV charging. These can be financial risks associated with the use of common property power but more commonly the impact on insurance premiums of which I am unaware of any facts to support this concern.

            Certainly in other cases where access to the Lot Owners metered power is not available a more sophisticated common property system might be required but even in this situation for a relatively small expenditure by the Owners Corporation there are options to install EV charging without any negative impact on the overall building supply.

            Keep a look out for the DPIE publication when released and assess what options might be applicable to your building.

             

          Viewing 4 replies - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)