Forum Replies Created

Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • in reply to: Clamping – how it can be done legally #17834

    Jimmy,

     

    Read your SMH article with great interest.

     

    How would this, say, apply to visitors parking illegally in a carpark (e.g. overstaying)? Since they aren’t owners or renters, are they then subject to the same by-laws? (i.e., is their permission given if we have a sign up?)

     

    Thanks.

    in reply to: Laundry by-law – visibility outside building? #16126

    Truth being told Jimmy I already thought of measuring line-of-sight angles and gave up after I realised it’s been far too long since I did physics at school.

     

    I will challenge this notice as I believe it’s a bit harsh – it’s not visible from ground level at all, and I also note the model by-laws under Sch 2 of the Strata Scheme Amendment Regulation 2010 (https://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/consol_reg/ssmr2010333/sch2.html) are much more receptive to drying stuff outside.

     

    Thanks for the words of encouragement. Will let you know how I get on!

    in reply to: Getting non-structural defects rectified #14796

    Just going to update this one Jimmy. Direct approaches to the builders didn't work, put in a request through the strata manager and I've had the builders back on site and they've resolved it the issues now. It took a bit of toing and froing but I'm glad it has worked out. Cheers for your initial advice, it helped immensely!

     

    Can I ask about the 'initial period'? The strata plan was registered with LPMA back in October, however the AGM has not been called yet, and I believe it's something to do with the amount of units sold. How can I check this out? I think that the developers are holding back to retain more control….

Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)