Forums NCAT – the NSW Tribunal Current Page

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #63761 Reply | Quote
    Investor13
    Flatchatter

      OC does not comply with the Act. Majority of owners support the SC. Multiple issues of non-compliance including no SC Meetings (limited communication to owners and no Minutes), no Breach of By-Law Notices issued, major repairs not actioned, etc

      All issues extensively documented for NCAT Hearing plus request and details for a Compulsory Strata Manager.

      NCAT decision supported OC which potentially sets a precedent for all Strata Schemes in NSW.

      Notice of Appeal lodged. Callover held. OC has engaged lawyers.

      1.How do I prove “not fair and equitable”, “against the weight of evidence”, ” a miscarriage of justice” without “rehashing” (wording of Member)?

      2.How do I avoid Costs being claimed against me by OC?

      3. What points of Law should I be aware of. I’m just using the Act.

      Can anyone help.

       

    Viewing 2 replies - 16 through 17 (of 17 total)
    • Author
      Replies
    • #64008 Reply
      Jimmy-T
      Keymaster

        You must first off calculate the cost of the lawyer versus your expected gain in dollars. Even if you lose the case, you are still up for the lawyer’s fee and if you win the case, you may still be out of pocket.

        That’s exactly the point the judge in this WA case was making, when he called taking legal action a “folly”

        If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
        #64039 Reply
        TrulEConcerned
        Flatchatter

          Thanks for pointing me in the direction of the WA case. It makes for interesting reading.

          I think the steps involved and cost of any legal action one takes when seeking redress, needs major reform. As it stands in many cases, an injured party in addition to suffering from noise, nuisances and other inconveniences foisted upon it by a vendor or neighbour, is financially worse off if they take action.

          The cost and means of seeking redress need major overhauling.

        Viewing 2 replies - 16 through 17 (of 17 total)
        Reply To: Reply #63803 in Assistance with NCAT Appeal without Lawyers
        PLEASE ... If your property is not in NSW, mention its location (state). Don't identify companies or individuals by name. Don't mention or promote your company or services. Keep acronyms and initials to a minimum. Please, don’t use “quote” unless there is a specific point to which you wish to refer, then highlight (define) that specific passage before you click on "quote". Otherwise just use reply. THANKS.

        You can use BBCodes to format your content.
        Your account can't use all available BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

        Your information:




        Forums NCAT – the NSW Tribunal Current Page