Forums Common Property Current Page

  • This topic is empty.
  • Creator
    Topic
  • #59997 Reply | Quote
    Marisha
    Flatchatter

      Bully Committee has started to obey 106 (1) fixing a failed membrane but is using a DIY approach, no flood testing. Technically it  is obeying 232 (2) (a) in that it is “exercising a function” .

      Having spent years failing to obey 106 (1) by pretending there was no membrane problem , they are now on a pathway to nowhere.  We are applying to Fair Trading to get them to exercise  a professional repair job.

      Am worried they can stall forever because they are in the process of fixing it…how long can an SC be in the process  of exercising a function?  They are so devious this could go on forever.,  Can one go to the Tribunal considering this weakness in the Act? Plenty of evidence they are skilled obfuscators.

    Reply To: Committee applying DIY fix to failed membrane
    PLEASE ... If your property is not in NSW, mention its location (state). Don't identify companies or individuals by name. Don't mention or promote your company or services. Keep acronyms and initials to a minimum. Please, don’t use “quote” unless there is a specific point to which you wish to refer, then highlight (define) that specific passage before you click on "quote". Otherwise just use reply. THANKS.

    You can use BBCodes to format your content.
    Your account can't use all available BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

    Your information:




    Forums Common Property Current Page