Forums By-laws and outlaws Current Page

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #59549 Reply | Quote
    justsaying
    Flatchatter

      OC approved a special by law by one vote. The next day the SM writes saying it was so close a recount was required? Correct or not?
      One of the OC held 5 proxies and he voted against the by law.100 lots

      6 proxies and 20 people in attendance ..,

      what are the next steps?

    Viewing 4 replies - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
    • Author
      Replies
    • #59611 Reply
      kaindub
      Flatchatter

        There is no provision in the act for a recount.

        At the meeting, an owner can ask for a poll vote, which is a form of recount. But if it was not asked at the meeting, then it can’t be invoked after the meeting.

        In any case the vote declared at the meeting is the one that stands.

        #59633 Reply
        justsaying
        Flatchatter
        Chat-starter

          thanks very much for your reply, kaindub. I have requested all “paperwork “ and the strata roll. It appears one owner (not on the SC) is controlling the communication resident system and acts as a sensor to stop some residents commenting! That same owner gathers proxies to ensure he keeps control . Hard  to believe this behaviour is tolerated but probably due to lack of interest throughout the scheme.

          thank you

          #59646 Reply
          Jimmy-T
          Keymaster

            It appears one owner (not on the SC) is controlling the communication resident system and acts as a censor to stop some residents commenting! That same owner gathers proxies to ensure he keeps control.

            The resident can only have one proxy for every 20 owners.  That’s another 19 owners per proxy from who you could surely garner someone to support you, if nothing else but to negate their controlling vote.

            The easiest way to get uninterested owners to take an interest is to tell them their money is being wasted.  Anything else is just garden fence squabbles to most people.

             

             

            If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
            #59648 Reply
            justsaying
            Flatchatter
            Chat-starter

              yes that true, Jimmy. naively I didn’t think the by law was contentious. The GM only had a few items on it, and only one by law that was legally planning to change something that numerous other owners do in breech of  by laws. Owners are disinterested even when levies escalate! They simply avoid OC unless they want something personal.  What a minefield Strata is, bullies control and squash those who try and abide by the law! SM trying to dodge the responsibility of the vote, after declaration ! 😩

               

               

               

               

               

               

              It was only when I saw

            Viewing 4 replies - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
            Reply To: Reply #59611 in Controlling OC members
            PLEASE ... If your property is not in NSW, mention its location (state). Don't identify companies or individuals by name. Don't mention or promote your company or services. Keep acronyms and initials to a minimum. Please, don’t use “quote” unless there is a specific point to which you wish to refer, then highlight (define) that specific passage before you click on "quote". Otherwise just use reply. THANKS.

            You can use BBCodes to format your content.
            Your account can't use all available BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

            Your information:




            Forums By-laws and outlaws Current Page