Current Page

[KAlice]

Our strata complex in NSW is currently in the throes of a large remediation process, mainly for water penetration issues. Our lot’s contribution to special levy was a bit < 20K. Our lot has a roof terrace, with a glass barrier on top of a solid wall to meet height regulations. The wall in question has 4 panes of glass approximately 750 mm x 300 mm. It joins a similar wall at right angles. The floor of the terrace needs to be lifted approx 150 mm at one end for waterproofing considerations, making the balcony height inconsistent with regulations. The proposal is for the strata to replace one of these panes, making the barrier consistent with regulations. The problem from my POV is that I’ll be left with an odd-looking, uneven top to my balcony wall. The roof terrace is probably the most valuable feature of the unit, so I do not wish to have it devalued. I have been told I can pay myself to have the other 3 panes replaced (approximately 2K, although a cheaper quote may be found). I could do this, but I have already contributed a lot to the remediation, as well as being the most inconvenienced unit owner over several years due to ongoing leaking.  What’s my position? Should I expect that strata modifications to common property on my lot  maintain the aesthetic integrity and value of my lot where possible (not hard to achieve here). Or should I suck it up? I was originally going to go with second option, but I think there could be an issue of principle here (and I’d be willing to take it further to test it, if appropriate). Would other owners accept a random pane of glass spoiling the alignment of their balcony (or swimming pool) wall? BTW, tthe exec committee are good, hard-working and reasonable people trying to do their best for the owners.  Thank you for your consideration of my first post. I have gained a lot of value in the past from scrolling through the forum on other topics.

Topic