Topic: Decisions decided upon by 3 out of 8 – FLAT CHAT

Create New Reply

This topic has 16 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 3 months ago by .

Creator

Topic
01/03/2011 at 2:53 pm #7265 Reply | Quote
Anonymous
At a recent exectutive committee meeting of our strata of 8 units only 5 members were in attendance. Of those 5 owners only 4 were up-to-date with their payments and were therefore not “financial” and subsequently not allowed to vote. This meant that only 4 were able to vote during the meeting and mostly the decisions went 3-1.

With so few people in attendance, does this form a real quorum and can 3 people decide on big financial decisions ($40,000.00) by just 3 people.

Is there any recourse to this decision by law?

Thanks in advance.
Creator

Topic

Viewing 16 replies (of 16 total)

← 1 2

Author

Replies
15/06/2011 at 4:16 pm #13005 Reply
Jimmy-T
Keymaster
And I should have expressed myself more clearly. Hug?

If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.

Quote
Author

Replies

Viewing 16 replies (of 16 total)

← 1 2

Reply To: Decisions decided upon by 3 out of 8

PLEASE ... If your property is not in NSW, mention its location (state). Don't identify companies or individuals by name. Don't mention or promote your company or services. Keep acronyms and initials to a minimum. Please, don’t use “quote” unless there is a specific point to which you wish to refer, then highlight (define) that specific passage before you click on "quote". Otherwise just use reply. THANKS.