Forums Strata Committees Elections Current Page

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #74586 Reply | Quote
    timSP
    Flatchatter

      NSW.

      Just recieved our AGM notice. (motions regarding committee attached)

      The current committee members are the only committee nominees.

      There is no facility to vote on individual committee nominees.

      There was no call for any new nominee’s

      I have been told, and am of the understanding that the elected of the committee CANNOT be undertaken if the meeting is held via electronic vote/paper form vote. Is this correct?

      Is what they have done legal?

      From past experience, it is clearly part of a concerted plan to exclude any new committee nominates and keeping the current members.

      This isn’t valid surely?

      What can be done?

      AGM is due to be held last week in June.

    Viewing 13 replies - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
    • Author
      Replies
    • #74636 Reply
      StrataChair
      Flatchatter
      (from NSW)

        Hi timSP,

        The relevant part of the legislation is Schedule 1 to the Strata Schemes Management Act and the Strata Schemes Management Regulation. [not sure why but I can’t put a link to this here…]

        You’re right. You can’t vote on the committee electronically. per s14A(a) of the Regulation: ‘an election must not be determined by pre-meeting electronic voting.’

        The notice of meeting must include a call for nominations per s 5(1) of Schedule 1

        A nomination may be made in writing before the meeting or orally at the meeting per s5(5).

        This is reiterated in the Regulation s 9 and 10.

        So decide your timing carefully. If there is a physical/electronic meeting at a particular time and place (as there needs to be to elect a committee) you could simply ensure you are there, nominate orally and point out that any pre-meeting electronic votes for the committee are invalid per the Regulation.

        Note also that, per s9(e) of Sched 1 there must be a ‘…motion to decide the number of members of the strata committee’ as well as a motion for their election per s9(f).

        Hope this helps! Good luck!

        #74644 Reply
        Jimmy-T
        Keymaster

          Would it be worth taking pre-emptive action at NCAT via a complaint and interim order?

          If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
          #74669 Reply
          timSP
          Flatchatter
          Chat-starter

            Thanks @jimmyt53 @StrataChair for your responses.

             


            @StrataChair

            So decide your timing carefully. If there is a physical/electronic meeting at a particular time and place (as there needs to be to elect a committee) you could simply ensure you are there, nominate orally and point out that any pre-meeting electronic votes for the committee are invalid per the Regulation.

            Regarding your suggestion above, Just to clarify, there will be no physical meeting, its paper vote online. (even though a date and time is specified as the strata managers offices) but I say this is just a formality needed to include to say a “meeting” was held.


            @jimmyt53

            Would it be worth taking pre-emptive action at NCAT via a complaint and interim order?

            Yes good idea. Although, it the motions regarding the committee election are indeed ruled null and void, I wonder does the committee retain their positions?

            We continually have this issue where the incumbent committee hold AGM meetings via electronic paper vote so as to NOT to hold a committee election and therefor retain their positions year on year. Not to mention the fact that our strata plan never has an opportunity to discuss matter relating to the running of out plan. Extremely infuriating!

             

            #74702 Reply
            StrataChair
            Flatchatter
            (from NSW)

              @timSP,

              Another suggestion: get a copy of the strata roll from your strata manager (and yes, the law requires them to give it to you) and write to other owners pointing out this is unlawful.

              If you want to make it really stick, pay a lawyer to do this on your behalf.

              Good luck!

              #74709 Reply
              Jimmy-T
              Keymaster

                Another suggestion: get a copy of the strata roll from your strata manager (and yes, the law requires them to give it to you) and write to other owners pointing out this is unlawful.

                Expect to be told that since the strata manager is also the secretary (under certain circumstances) then the strata roll has already been provided.  Also expect to be told that because of privacy concerns, you will not be given the email addresses of owners, even though they are an essential part of the roll.

                Both of these arguments are total BS.

                I had a huge fight with Netstrata over this at our investment property and, by the way. the strata commissioner declined to say who was right and wrong in this fight.

                If the committee members are already playing fast and loose with the law, I would expect them to go to the barricades on this too.  Apply for mediation at Fair Trading, seek an interim order and then see what falls out when you shake them up.

                If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
                #74751 Reply
                Mailbox
                Flatchatter

                  Just reading through the posts…timSP says the AGM is a ...”paper online vote”... so presumably this is not just a meeting decided by pre-meeting voting by email / mail etc but an actual ONLINE  meeting.

                  I couldn’t see the copy of the Notice of Meeting but has the SM provided a Zoom / Teams link for the meeting ?

                  In any event you could ask for a link so as to attend and follow the advice of StrataChair….

                  “So decide your timing carefully. If there is a physical/electronic meeting at a particular time and place (as there needs to be to elect a committee) you could simply ensure you are there, nominate orally and point out that any pre-meeting electronic votes for the committee are invalid per the Regulation.”

                  #74798 Reply
                  timSP
                  Flatchatter
                  Chat-starter

                     

                    Thanks @Jimmy-T

                    If the committee members are already playing fast and loose with the law, I would expect them to go to the barricades on this too.  Apply for mediation at Fair Trading, seek an interim order and then see what falls out when you shake them up.

                    Yes Good idea I will do that. Committee and strata manager extremely belligerent and are doing whatever they please, whether legal or not. They are waiting for owners to chase them in court, NCAT or fair trading, which just cost lot owners more money.

                     

                     

                    #74797 Reply
                    timSP
                    Flatchatter
                    Chat-starter

                      @Strata-Answers

                      Just reading through the posts…timSP says the AGM is a ...”paper online vote”... so presumably this is not just a meeting decided by pre-meeting voting by email / mail etc but an actual ONLINE  meeting.

                      Just to clarify, there will be NO physical meeting, its “pre-meeting paper vote”. (even though a date and time is specified as the strata managers offices) but I say this is just a formality needed to include to say a “meeting” was held.

                      This has been the case for the last 3 years AGM, (apart from one EGM held via zoom). So it CAN be held by zoom, but SC choose this form so no discussions or questions can be asked, PLUS the retain their postions on the committee. Brilliant isnt it?!!!

                      #74801 Reply
                      Jimmy-T
                      Keymaster

                        I get the feeling that a lawyer’s letter, from an experienced strata lawyer, reminding the committee of their legal obligations, might work wonders here.  Shouldn’t be too expensive and would make them realise the seriousness of their situation.

                        Failing that, if you could get something in writing out of Fair Trading, that might do the trick.

                        If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
                        #74849 Reply
                        Jimmy-T
                        Keymaster

                          Just to clarify, there will be NO physical meeting, its “pre-meeting paper vote”. (even though a date and time is specified as the strata managers offices) but I say this is just a formality needed to include to say a “meeting” was held.

                          Then the election of the committee is invalid, according to the Strata Schemes Regulation

                          14A   Pre-meeting electronic voting

                          For the Act, Schedule 1, clause 28(3) and Schedule 2, clause 10(3), the following applies in relation to voting by pre-meeting electronic voting—

                          (a)  an election must not be determined by pre-meeting electronic voting,

                          If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
                          #74880 Reply
                          timSP
                          Flatchatter
                          Chat-starter

                            as the AGM which is to be held via pre meeting paper vote, there No actual in person meeting.

                            Question:

                            Are the Voting forms post vote required to be made available for lot owners to view, so that the votes can be verified?
                            Are they considered “records of the plan”?
                            How can the voting be verified, including any proxy votes?

                            I know that one suggestion will be “just request a strata search”, but due to past experiences the strata manager  will most likely ensure that it will be extremely difficult for the voting to be verified.

                            #74919 Reply
                            Jimmy-T
                            Keymaster

                              The various Acts say the records of electronic voting must be retained and mad available to owners on request.

                               

                              From the Regulations (sl-2016-501 (nsw.gov.au)_

                              41 Electronic voting records
                              (1)For the purposes of section 180 (1) (j) of the Act, records relating to electronic voting
                              for motions for resolutions by an owners corporation must be retained by an owners
                              corporation.
                              (2)For the purposes of section 180 (2) of the Act, the period for which an owners
                              corporation is required to retain voting papers under section 180 (1) (g) of the Act or
                              records referred to in subclause (1) is 13 months, if the voting papers or records relate
                              to secret ballots, unless the papers relate to the appointment of a strata renewal
                              committee or other decisions in connection with Part 10 of the Strata Schemes
                              Development Act 2015.
                              42 Inspection of records
                              For the purposes of section 182 (3) (k) of the Act, the owners corporation must make
                              available for inspection the accounting records and other records relating to the strata
                              scheme that are kept by the strata managing agent.

                              You’ll find the relevant sections of the Act here: https://legislation.nsw.gov.au/view/html/inforce/current/act-2015-050#pt.10-div.2

                               

                              If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
                              #75408 Reply
                              glebegirl00
                              Flatchatter

                                this is very interesting reading thank you. In our scheme, the SM makes a blanket statement at the AGM via zoom,   that the all male  SC has agreed to stay on for another year so its never declared vacant and a call for nominations. nevertheless this SC between themselves get enough proxies to push through any other nominations . Women are not welcome !  Strata living is very tiresome and its easy to understand people wont get involved

                              Viewing 13 replies - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
                              Reply To: Reply #74919 in Paper AGM agenda only allows re-election of current committee
                              PLEASE ... If your property is not in NSW, mention its location (state). Don't identify companies or individuals by name. Don't mention or promote your company or services. Keep acronyms and initials to a minimum. Please, don’t use “quote” unless there is a specific point to which you wish to refer, then highlight (define) that specific passage before you click on "quote". Otherwise just use reply. THANKS.

                              You can use BBCodes to format your content.
                              Your account can't use all available BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

                              Your information:




                              Forums Strata Committees Elections Current Page